Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Executive Committee 
 Postdocs 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 Publications 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Seminars 
 Postdoc Seminars Archive 
 Quantum Lunch 
 Quantum Lunch Archive 
 P/T Colloquia 
 Archive 
 Ulam Scholar 
 
 Postdoc Nominations 
 Student Requests 
 Student Program 
 Visitor Requests 
 Description 
 Past Visitors 
 Services 
 General 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
1:00 PM - 2:00 PM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Seminar

Magnetic reconnection in weak and strong guide-field regimes

Adam Stanier
LANL XCP-6

Magnetic reconnection can change the topology of magnetic fields in a highly conducting plasma. It plays a key role in magnetic field relaxation in many astrophysical and laboratory plasmas, from solar and stellar flares to magnetic confinement devices. To explain many such phenomena, it is important to understand how the rates of magnetic reconnection behave in large and weakly collisional systems. A key question concerns what physics must be retained within reduced models to be able to reproduce the reconnection rates and global behaviour of fully kinetic systems. Here we consider the effect of the guide field, a normal and non-reconnecting component of the magnetic field, on the local reconnection physics and global evolution of the reconnecting system. It is demonstrated for weak guide field that the commonly used Hall-MHD fluid model is unable to reproduce the reconnection rate, pile-up field, outflow velocity or diffusion region geometry of fully kinetic simulations. Instead, a hybrid model with kinetic ions and fluid electrons is the minimum sufficient model to reproduce these key features of the problem [1]. For the strong guide field regime we evaluate a very simple reduced two-fluid model against cold ion fully kinetic simulations. Good agreement is found in both the rate and overall length of the layer, despite visible differences in electron scale physics [2]. References: [1] A. Stanier, W. Daughton, L. Chacon, H. Karimabadi, J. Ng, Y.-M. Huang, A. Hakim, and A. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 175004 (2015). [2] A. Stanier, A. N. Simakov, L. Chacon, and W. Daughton, Phys. Plasmas 22, 101203 (2015).