Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Executive Committee 
 Postdocs 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 Publications 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Seminars 
 Postdoc Seminars Archive 
 Quantum Lunch 
 Quantum Lunch Archive 
 P/T Colloquia 
 Archive 
 Ulam Scholar 
 
 Postdoc Nominations 
 Student Requests 
 Student Program 
 Visitor Requests 
 Description 
 Past Visitors 
 Services 
 General 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
1:00 PM - 2:00 PM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Seminar

When are Centralized Infrastructure Networks Preferable to Decentralized Networks?

Seth Blumsack
Pennsylvania State University and Santa Fe Institute

While many large infrastructure networks, such as power, water, and natural gas systems, have similar properties governing flows, these systems have distinctly different sizes and topological structures. This paper seeks to understand how these different features can emerge from relatively simple design principles. Specifically, we seek to describe the conditions under which it is optimal to build decentralized network infrastructures, such as a microgrid, rather than centralized ones, such as a large high-voltage power system. To investigate this question, we consider a network design problem for a system planner who seeks to deliver randomly distributed resources to randomly distributed end-users in a way that minimizes the total capital and operational cost of providing services and minimizes the magnitude of services not delivered. This network design model is formulated as a mixed-integer program with a novel method of representing security type constraints like those normally found in power systems analysis. While our method is simple it is useful in explaining why sometimes, but not always, it is economical to build large, interconnected networks and in other cases it is preferable to use smaller, distributed systems. The results indicate that there is not a single set of infrastructure cost conditions that cause a transition from centralized networks being optimal, to decentralized architectures. Instead, as capital costs increase network sizes decrease gradually, according to a power-law. However, as the value of reliability increases network sizes increase abruptly---there is a threshold in the value of reliability at which large, highly interconnected networks are economically justified. And as the value of reliability increases the relationship between capital costs and network sizes becomes even more sudden. We also motivate our use of these types of design models with an example of electricity network design in a developing country, using mobile phone data to characterize spatial heterogeneity in demand for energy services.

Host: Beth Hornbein