Lab Home | Phone | Search
Center for Nonlinear Studies  Center for Nonlinear Studies
 Home 
 People 
 Current 
 Executive Committee 
 Postdocs 
 Visitors 
 Students 
 Research 
 Publications 
 Conferences 
 Workshops 
 Sponsorship 
 Talks 
 Seminars 
 Postdoc Seminars Archive 
 Quantum Lunch 
 Quantum Lunch Archive 
 P/T Colloquia 
 Archive 
 Ulam Scholar 
 
 Postdoc Nominations 
 Student Requests 
 Student Program 
 Visitor Requests 
 Description 
 Past Visitors 
 Services 
 General 
 
 History of CNLS 
 
 Maps, Directions 
 CNLS Office 
 T-Division 
 LANL 
 
Monday, January 22, 2024
12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
CNLS Conference Room (TA-3, Bldg 1690)

Quantum Lunch

(Note: new webex info) Quantum simulation: Dream or nightmare?

Ivan Deutsch
University of New Mexico

Soon after Shor's algorithm and the explosion of quantum information science, Serge Haroche and Jean-Michel Raimond asked in a famous 1996 Physics Today Article, "Quantum Computing: Dream or Nightmare?". They weren't alone. In the early days some of the pioneers, like Ralf Landauer and Bill Unruh, rightfully questioned whether the exponential reduction in computational complexity would be offset by the exponential sensitivity to noise and decoherence. In 1996 quantum error correction had just been "discovered" but fault-tolerance was not yet fully established. Without fault-tolerant quantum error correction, everyone understood that true computational advantage in implementing quantum algorithms, like Shor's, was not possible. In the intervening years, quantum simulation of matter was seen as lower hanging fruit, with much less demanding requirements for precision control and isolation from the environment. This is because phases are matter are "macrostates" rather than "microstates"and by definition, robust to the exact configuration of the constituents. In contrast, for Shor's algorithm, the bit-flip on any single qubit can be completely catastrophic. It then behooves us to ask, if the macrostate is robust to imperfections, might it be computationally simple? By contrast, we expect the most nonclassical quantum complex states to be hypersensitive to decoherence, as Wojciech Zurek taught us in understanding the quantum-to-classical transition. In this seminar I will revisit these questions, exploring the tradeoff between robustness and complexity and the road to achieving quantum computational complexity in the modern NISQ-era.

Short Bio: Ivan Deutsch is Distinguished Professor & Regents' Professor of Physics & Astronomy at the University of New Mexico, and Director of the Center for Quantum Information and Control (CQuIC). He works at the interface of AMO physics, quantum optics, and quantum information theory in both implementations of quantum information processors and their foundational properties. He did his bachelors at MIT and received his PhD from UC Berkeley, joining the faculty at UNM in 1995, where together with Carl Caves, he established the Quantum Information Science group. He leads Quantum New Mexico (QNM), the program to solidify New Mexico as a Quantum Information Science hub for the nation, in a collaboration between UNM, Sandia National Labs, Los Alamos National Labs, and other institutions across the state.

Host: Samuel Slezak (CCS-3)